Gay Introductions »

comingoutjournal:

By Domenick Scudera
Professor of Theater and Chair of the Theater and Dance department, Ursinus College

‘Tis the season of holiday celebrations, office parties and family gatherings. For gay people like me, these social events lead to a unique problem. When I introduce the man I love to other people at a party, I cannot use the convenient title “husband” to explain who he is to me. Same-sex marriage is not recognized in our state. 

There are many other options that I could use to introduce Brian to my long-lost Aunty Trudy from Duluth, but none of them is satisfactory. Here are a few:

Boyfriend: Brian and I have been together for 16 years. We are both… well, let’s just say we are both on the other side of 45. We are too old and have been together too long to be “boyfriends.” If we were going steady, or going to the prom, then maybe “boyfriends” would be more appropriate.

‘Friend’: I have lots of friends, and Brian is one of them. In fact, he is my best friend. But he is much more than that, so if I were to use this term to explain our relationship, it necessitates the use of quotation marks, italics or winks, as in: “I’d like you to meet my ‘friend’ Brian [wink, wink].” You could use the word “roommate” in the same way: “my ‘roommate’ Brian [wink, wink].” This is all a little too cutesy for my taste.

Mate: This word would be fine if we were pirates. “Aye, matey, this here’s me first mate Brian. Now swab the deck. Arrrgh.”

Partner: This word makes us sound like attorneys in a law firm: “Scudera, Strachan and Associates, Homosexual Partners Since 1995.” (Well, this could work if you consider our dogs “associates.”)

Domestic Partner: This is even worse than “partner.” It makes us sound like we are joint owners of a home cleaning service: “Scudera, Strachan and Associates, Domestic Gays Since 1995. We Make Your Floors Sparkle!”

Lover: This defines our relationship by a sex act. Although Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum may want to define our “lifestyle” this way, I would rather not. Sex is just one aspect of many in our lives. It seems random to choose one part of our relationship to represent who we are to each other. Brian cooks dinner sometimes, but I would not introduce him as “my chef Brian.” He also does the gardening in our yard, but he is not “my gardener Brian.” I could just as easily call him my “confidant,” my “driver,” my “dog walker,” or “the guy I watch TV with.” All these choices, including “lover,” are too limiting.

Significant Other: I like the “significant” part, because Brian is significant to me. We could also use other adjectives, like “meaningful other” or “substantial other,” but, no matter what the modifier may be, “other” seems distant and cold. It makes him a stranger.

Husband: Unfortunately, Pennsylvania is not going to legalize marriage anytime soon, so this term is off the table. Yes, I could call him “husband” anyway, but if I do, it is a painful reminder of our second-class citizenship.

No Title: I could just say “Meet Brian” with no explanation, forcing people to figure out the connection. I have tried this before with modest results. A few years ago, we went to a family reunion. As we drove up, my male cousins, whom I had not seen in some time, were standing in a group in the driveway. We got out of the car and shook hands, and I introduced Brian solely by his name. I do not like to stereotype people, but, truth be told, the two of us are stereotypically gay. My cousins stared at us, mouths agape. Brian and I smiled gaily, went inside, and found the liquor.

All: Of course, I could just combine all the terms for a fuller explanation of our relationship: “Have you met Brian, my gay, homosexual, male, significant husband/mate/friend/boyfriend/lover/partner?” But that is a bit unwieldy.

When we are denied the right to marry, we are denied more than just a wedding ceremony. We are denied convenient recognition of our relationship on a daily basis. I cannot rightfully call Brian by the appropriate, all-encompassing term “husband,” and, therefore, society is being denied the right to see our relationship for what it really is.

Happy holidays!

Love,
Domenick and that other guy

(via fuckyeahfeminists)

9:00am | 7 Jan 2012 | 363 notes
next previous

Notes:

  1. thisbreathwilllast reblogged this from thatismah0ganyy
  2. song-of-myself35990 reblogged this from thatismah0ganyy
  3. thatismah0ganyy reblogged this from harmonianecterepassu-s
  4. phthalocyanine reblogged this from comingoutjournal
  5. doctor-sherwood reblogged this from kokytos
  6. teacherscrackingrules liked this
  7. kokytos reblogged this from rainbowfairyprincess
  8. missmokushiroku reblogged this from superherojuice
  9. rainbowfairyprincess reblogged this from superherojuice and added:
    Think what you will about the institution of marriage, it’s really important to some people.
  10. sofazzio liked this
  11. gematriya liked this
  12. superherojuice reblogged this from everythinginconsequential
  13. likeasaurus reblogged this from dutchbag
  14. ex-umbra-in-solem reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  15. loubluebird liked this
  16. hisamusingworld reblogged this from intranaut
  17. wishhingwell reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  18. live-a-little-darling reblogged this from dutchbag
  19. flammablevermillion liked this
  20. accidentallytechnohazardous liked this
  21. accidentallytechnohazardous reblogged this from horrorshowweekend
  22. horrorshowweekend reblogged this from dutchbag
  23. dutchbag reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  24. smirkinggirl reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  25. bruthuhman reblogged this from r3st-in-pieces
  26. r3st-in-pieces reblogged this from eatbitchesforbreakfast
  27. eatbitchesforbreakfast reblogged this from lesbianunicorn
  28. lesbianunicorn reblogged this from foreversupergay
  29. phthalocyanine liked this
  30. karcy liked this
  31. allthingswiseandwonderful liked this
  32. lainieyeoh reblogged this from allthingswiseandwonderful and added:
    “All” sounds possible. This is Brian, my all :P
  33. allthingswiseandwonderful reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  34. princessunicornsparkles reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  35. humboldtoctober reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  36. awkbbydinosaur liked this
  37. modernmethadone liked this
  38. estallidos reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  39. iwanttobetheonetowalkinthesun reblogged this from hisnamewasbeanni
  40. piepeloe reblogged this from weneedrevolutionarychanges
  41. naeku reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  42. hisnamewasbeanni reblogged this from deliciousfriend and added:
    I realize that this isn’t answering the issue at hand (which I love this post for addressing so eloquently and...
  43. weneedrevolutionarychanges reblogged this from arsenalinthetrunk
  44. intranaut reblogged this from deliciousfriend
  45. deliciousfriend reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  46. storyteller-soldier reblogged this from pandasinplaid
  47. pandasinplaid reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  48. donnasaurus reblogged this from comingoutjournal
  49. shegoesallaround reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  50. emberfine reblogged this from espill and added:
    If this were me, I’d end up introducing them by throwing both arms around them, squeezing, smiling, and saying “This is...
  51. Show more notesLoading...
All Things Wise and Wonderful

Archive

RSS

Go on, tell me a story...

Following:

Lunchbox Theme V0.1 by johnlempka.